2027: Atiku Vows To Restore Fuel Subsidy If Elected President
Former Vice President and African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar, has promised to restore Nigeria's fuel subsidy if he is elected president in the 2027 general election.
Atiku made the promise while speaking about the effect of subsidy removal on Nigerians and what he believes should have happened to the money saved by the Federal Government.
His position has brought the fuel subsidy debate back into the political conversation, with the 2027 election campaign expected to focus heavily on the economy and the rising cost of living.
Atiku said he did not originally oppose the removal of the subsidy. His concern, he explained, is what happened to the money after the policy was removed.
Read More: Adeleke Wins Again: How Osun Election Result Could Affect APC Ahead of 2027
He questioned where the savings from the policy had gone, arguing that Nigerians should have seen clear benefits from the money saved by the government.
According to Atiku, the funds should have been used to reduce poverty and improve the lives of Nigerians, including investments in education, healthcare, security and job creation.
The former vice president said that if elected president in 2027, he would restore the fuel subsidy and ensure that those who allegedly diverted money meant for the programme are made to return it.
“If elected, I will bring back the oil subsidy, and whoever stole the money must refund it,” Atiku said.
The promise comes more than three years after President Bola Ahmed Tinubu announced the removal of the petrol subsidy during his inauguration on May 29, 2023.
The decision immediately changed the price of petrol and affected the cost of transportation and other goods and services across the country.
For many Nigerians, the impact of the policy has been felt in everyday life. Transport fares increased, businesses faced higher operating costs, and the cost of moving food and other goods from one location to another also went up.
Small businesses that depend on petrol and diesel to power generators have also had to deal with higher running costs.
For families already struggling with limited income, the increase in the cost of basic needs has remained a major concern.
It is this experience that Atiku is now pointing to as he makes his case ahead of the 2027 presidential election.
He argues that removing the subsidy would have been easier for Nigerians to accept if the money saved had been properly channelled into areas that directly affect their lives.
Among the areas he mentioned are education, healthcare, security, poverty reduction and job creation.
Atiku's argument is that government must show citizens what they are getting in return when difficult economic decisions are taken.
In his view, the savings from subsidy removal should translate into better public services and more opportunities for Nigerians.
The issue is likely to become an important part of the 2027 campaign because fuel remains closely linked to the daily lives of Nigerians.
When petrol prices rise, the effect is usually felt beyond filling stations.
A commercial driver may increase transport fares because of higher fuel costs. A trader may increase the price of goods because it costs more to move them. A small business owner may also spend more money on fuel to keep the business running.
This makes the question of fuel subsidy more than just an issue about petrol prices.
It is also an issue about the wider cost of living and how government economic decisions affect ordinary households.
Other stories: Court sets aside judgement ordering INEC to register NDC
For Nigerians who have faced higher transport and living costs since the subsidy was removed, Atiku's promise could attract attention.
However, restoring the subsidy would also come with major financial questions.
A future government would have to explain how much it plans to spend on the subsidy, where the money would come from and how it would prevent waste and abuse.
The subsidy system has been controversial in Nigeria for many years because of the large amounts of public money involved.
Supporters of the policy have argued that it protects Nigerians from sudden increases in petrol prices, while critics have raised concerns about the cost to government and the way the system was managed.
The Tinubu administration defended the removal of the subsidy as a necessary step to reduce pressure on government finances and free up resources for development.
Atiku's position challenges whether Nigerians have received enough visible benefits from the change.
He wants the government to account for the savings and explain how the money has been used.
The former vice president has also called for people who allegedly diverted money meant for the subsidy to return the funds.
That part of his statement adds another dimension to the debate, as it shifts attention from petrol prices to accountability and the management of public resources.
For Atiku, Nigerians should be able to see a clear connection between government revenue and improvements in their daily lives.
His proposal, however, is likely to face questions as the 2027 campaign develops.
One major question is whether bringing back the subsidy would provide lasting relief or simply return the country to a system that placed a heavy burden on government finances.
Another question is how the government would ensure that the subsidy reaches consumers instead of creating opportunities for fraud.
If properly managed, a subsidy could help reduce the price of petrol and provide some relief for households and businesses.
But if poorly managed, it could once again become expensive for the government and reduce the money available for other public projects.
This is why Atiku's promise is likely to generate a wider debate about Nigeria's economic direction.
The 2027 presidential election is expected to be strongly influenced by economic concerns, including food prices, transportation costs, energy prices, employment and household income.
Atiku is now offering voters a different position on fuel pricing by promising to restore the subsidy if given the opportunity to lead the country.
Whether the proposal will convince voters will depend partly on how Atiku explains the cost of the policy and how his administration would prevent the problems associated with the previous subsidy system.
For now, his position is clear.
Atiku Abubakar says he will restore the fuel subsidy if elected president in 2027 and wants those accused of taking money from the subsidy system to return it.
His promise is likely to remain part of the political conversation as the election draws closer and other presidential candidates begin to present their own economic plans.
For millions of Nigerians, the central question will remain whether the next government can reduce the pressure on households while also ensuring that public funds are used properly.
As the 2027 election approaches, the debate over whether Nigeria should restore fuel subsidy is set to become one of the key economic issues voters will have to consider.